Citation de FrondonSakhey
https://www.sec.gov/Archi[...]2519241112/d635330df1.htm

"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and may cause certain side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed not to irreversibly change cell DNA. Side effects observed in other gene therapies, however, could negatively impact the perception of immunotherapies despite the differences in mechanism. In addition, because no mRNA-based product has been approved, the regulatory pathway in the United States and may other jurisdictions for approval is uncertain. The pathway for an individualized therapy, such as our iNeST mRNA-based immunotherapy where each patient receives a different combination of mRNAs, remains particularly unsettled. The number and design of the clinical and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established, may be different from those required for gene therapy products or therapies that are not individualized or may require safety testing like gene therapy products. Moreover, the length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and submit an application for marketing approval by a regulatory authority varies significantly from one pharmaceutical product to the next and may be difficult to predict."


Les golems qui vont dire que sec.gov c'est complotiste

Ils n'admettent pas ici qu'il s'agit de thérapies géniques, ils se plaignent que leurs technologies de traitements à ARNm y soient associées selon une évaluation obsolète en expliquant qu'elles n'y correspondent pas et ne présentent pas les mêmes implications, d'autant plus qu'il est question dans ce document de technologies pré-vaccins covid destinées à traiter plutôt que prévenir des maladies donc hors sujet.

C'est pas complotiste, faut juste lire le document avant de le partager sous une fausse interprétation.