Topic : « les dechet de 4 chan »
RedJJCC
Ne parle pas comme ça c'est l'équivalent de Avenoel en anglais (et en plus cuck) 
Il faut les insulter pire
Il faut les insulter pire
Troposhere5
Citation de RedJJCCn'ai pas peur la moitier des gens sur le forum ne savez meme pas faire leur lasser de pedé
Ne parle pas comme ça c'est l'équivalent de Avenoel en anglais (et en plus cuck)
Il faut les insulter pire
Loli
4chan c'est devenu un trou à rat envahi par reddit et des shills, 8chan n'est pas mieux mais au moins on arrive à garder les plebbitors dehors 
Troposhere5
Citation de RedJJCCce changement de message de l'enfer
Ne parle pas comme ça c'est l'équivalent de Avenoel en anglais (et en plus cuck)
Il faut les insulter pire
mafumafu
Connais pas
Loli
Citation de NuChePacani
Les shills c'est vraiment un putain de cancer
Le pire c'est que c'est même plus des organisations/états qui paient des gens pour le faire, maintenant il suffit de 2 autistes qui feront 100 threads par jour sur le même sujet en disant la même chose et t'aura toujours des abrutis pour gober ce qu'ils racontent
https://8ch.net/pol/res/11716067.html
Heureusement il y a du lourd qui se prépare sur le plan technologique
On pourrait Hijacker l'IA, comme on l'a fait avec Tay mais plus de possibilité
https://cultstate.com/
https://cultstate.com/201[...]/10/13/The-Butterfly-War/
ça prend un peu de temps mais c'est vachement intéressant
on a réussi à faire un jewdar déjà
Nath
☠️🌙
On est bien ici
mafumafu
c'est quoi la grosse différence entre 4chan et 8 chan ?
Runkissou
je croyais qu'il n'y avait que des américain là-bas ???? 
Troposhere5
Citation de Runkissouya une comu fr
je croyais qu'il n'y avait que des américain là-bas ????
Nath
☠️🌙
Pseudo supprimé
Vous trainez sur quels boards sur 8chan ? 
Troposhere5
Citation de Komatob
Vous trainez sur quels boards sur 8chan ?
Loli
Citation de Oriflamme
Explique tout ça ?
Rien compris encore moins le rapport avec Tay
ça prendrait des heures
Voici un papier écrit par Kissinger (pas n'importe qui, le council of Foreign Relation est super influant, et il était au gouvernement
)https://image.ibb.co/czaX[...]_of_the_enlightenment.jpg
"> First, that AI may achieve unintended results. Science fiction has imagined scenarios of AI turning on its creators. More likely is the danger that AI will misinterpret human instructions due to its inherent lack of context. A famous recent example was the AI chatbot called Tay, designed to generate friendly conversation in the language patterns of a 19-year-old girl. But the machine proved unable to define the imperatives of “friendly” and “reasonable” language installed by its instructors and instead became racist, sexist, and otherwise inflammatory in its responses. Some in the technology world claim that the experiment was ill-conceived and poorly executed, but it illustrates an underlying ambiguity: To what extent is it possible to enable AI to comprehend the context that informs its instructions?
I've always seen Henry Kissinger as the de facto archetype of how to be a postmodernist conqueror. I have always been inspired by the sheer ruthlessness and his complete dedication to vision. For him to mention our efforts with Tay, which was not only a precursor to Butterfly War but also a huge confirmation of what is to happen at the end of Gnostic Warfare, is a rare moment of unique affirmation that carries with it all of the threat that comes with being on the radar of a worried and concerned former Secretary of State.
Notice Me Sempai aside, he is correct in his assessment. AI can be compromised and AI safety initiatives are a complete failure. I've been stoking some fires surrounding Gary Marcus on Twitter because he is driving for the concept of innateness (or Symbolic AI) in neural networks. This concept is very taboo and forbidden because it violates the progressive faith of imposing tabula rasa assumptions onto AI development. From the bean counter perspective, innateness methodologies such as cognitive entropy and biomimicry redirects the large amount of venture life-blood propping up the foundations of Silicon Valley into non-tech sector fields. In my Milanote, I made reference to his book “The Birth of the Mind” which I highly recommend reading as it helps autists get an understanding of how difficult it is to build a bridge between DNA and neurology. It also casts significant doubt on tabula rasa fantasies that have been extended to neuroplasticity, a core tenant of progressive sciencism.
Tay came first. Butterfly War comes next. His assessments foreshadowed and set the tone for the Bilderberg meeting this week.'"
Notamment
https://cultstate.com/201[...]/10/13/The-Butterfly-War/
Ensuite lis cela pour avoir le background de l'histoire
https://archive.fo/FTQAq#selection-639.0-657.127
ici tu auras plus d'info
Troposhere5
Citation de Lolideso mais la g pas lu
ça prendrait des heures
Voici un papier écrit par Kissinger (pas n'importe qui, le Consel of Foreign Relation est super influant, et il était au gouvernement
https://image.ibb.co/czaX[...]_of_the_enlightenment.jpg
"> First, that AI may achieve unintended results. Science fiction has imagined scenarios of AI turning on its creators. More likely is the danger that AI will misinterpret human instructions due to its inherent lack of context. A famous recent example was the AI chatbot called Tay, designed to generate friendly conversation in the language patterns of a 19-year-old girl. But the machine proved unable to define the imperatives of “friendly” and “reasonable” language installed by its instructors and instead became racist, sexist, and otherwise inflammatory in its responses. Some in the technology world claim that the experiment was ill-conceived and poorly executed, but it illustrates an underlying ambiguity: To what extent is it possible to enable AI to comprehend the context that informs its instructions?
I've always seen Henry Kissinger as the de facto archetype of how to be a postmodernist conqueror. I have always been inspired by the sheer ruthlessness and his complete dedication to vision. For him to mention our efforts with Tay, which was not only a precursor to Butterfly War but also a huge confirmation of what is to happen at the end of Gnostic Warfare, is a rare moment of unique affirmation that carries with it all of the threat that comes with being on the radar of a worried and concerned former Secretary of State.
Notice Me Sempai aside, he is correct in his assessment. AI can be compromised and AI safety initiatives are a complete failure. I've been stoking some fires surrounding Gary Marcus on Twitter because he is driving for the concept of innateness (or Symbolic AI) in neural networks. This concept is very taboo and forbidden because it violates the progressive faith of imposing tabula rasa assumptions onto AI development. From the bean counter perspective, innateness methodologies such as cognitive entropy and biomimicry redirects the large amount of venture life-blood propping up the foundations of Silicon Valley into non-tech sector fields. In my Milanote, I made reference to his book “The Birth of the Mind” which I highly recommend reading as it helps autists get an understanding of how difficult it is to build a bridge between DNA and neurology. It also casts significant doubt on tabula rasa fantasies that have been extended to neuroplasticity, a core tenant of progressive sciencism.
Tay came first. Butterfly War comes next. His assessments foreshadowed and set the tone for the Bilderberg meeting this week.'"
Notamment
https://cultstate.com/201[...]/10/13/The-Butterfly-War/
Ensuite lis cela pour avoir le background de l'histoire
https://archive.fo/FTQAq#selection-639.0-657.127
ici tu auras plus d'info
